Talmud sur Samuel 1 1:14

BARAITHA.⁶⁰K 10. There are some differences in the two versions. Hence [the Rabbis] declared: Ten categories of persons are like bastards but are not [legally] such, and they are: the children of a niddah, the children of one who is under a ban of excommunication, the children [born] of fear, the children of a woman who is forced [to cohabit], the children of a hated wife, the children of a seduced woman, the children of a wife divorced in the heart, the children of a woman thought to be another, the children of a drunken woman; and some say, the children of a brazen woman, of a woman asleep and of one who has intercourse with his betrothed in his father-in-law’s house.
GEMARA. The children of a niddah ultimately become leprous; the children of one under excommunication will ultimately be banned from the congregation of Israel, the children of fear will ultimately remove themselves from the source of holiness,⁶¹They will abandon the Torah. the children of a hated woman will hate the precepts [of the Torah], the children of a woman who had been forced will themselves be violated,⁶²H quotes authority for the reading אָנוסִין (violaters) and not אֲנו·סִין or נאנסין (violated). as for the children of a seduced woman ultimately others will seduce their heart, the children of a woman divorced in the heart will ultimately divorce themselves from all good and cleave to evil, the children of a woman thought to be another will ultimately change their faith, the children of a drunken woman will have children who will [be thought of] as though they were drunk, as it is written, How long wilt thou be drunken?⁶³1 Sam. 1, 14. which is rendered in the Targum ‘demented’. ‘Some say, the children of a brazen woman’: these are persons who are bold-faced; ‘the children of a woman asleep’: these are the sluggish. With regard to the children of ‘one who has intercourse with his betrothed in his father-in-law’s house’ there is a difference of opinion between Rab and Samuel: one says that the child is a bastard, and the other that he is the child of unknown paternity.⁶⁴Under Jewish law both suffer from certain disqualifications.